News 
 Local News 
 News 
 General 
 Brunswick Terminal Station: Government overrides council 

Brunswick Terminal Station: Government overrides council

21 Feb, 2012 08:24 AM
WHAT DO YOU THINK? SCROLL TO THE BOTTOM OF THIS STORY TO POST A COMMENT.

THE State Government's decision to approve an expansion of the Brunswick Terminal Station has been branded a "slap in the face" of residents.

Last week State Planning Minister Matthew Guy approved the $271 million terminal upgrade, rezoning the land from residential to special use. The move overturned a Moreland City Council decision to reject the proposal, put forward by power companies SP AusNet, CitiPower, and the Australian Energy Market Operator.

Merri Creek Residents Group spokesman Ramon Collodetti said the decision was "just outrageous" and that numerous safety concerns had been left unaddressed. "We are calling on the ministers and government to appoint an independent review panel to reassess the placement of the new terminal station."

Brunswick MLA Jane Garrett said last year she and the community had repeatedly lobbied the State Government to get involved in the terminal station application process.

She said Minister Guy's decision to call in the application was a "slap in the face of the community".

"They told us it was a local council decision and council rejected it as inappropriate. The State Government should have been involved from the beginning," Ms Garrett said.

"This shows extreme contempt for the community."

Energy and Resources Minister Michael O'Brien backed Mr Guy's decision. He said alternative sites for the terminal station had been explored in locations such as Kingsville and Coburg, but that greater construction and running costs in these areas would have meant higher power bills for consumers.

SPAusnet spokesman Jonathon Geddes said the power companies had consulted with the community and Moreland council to develop the final design for the terminal station.

Work on the upgrade is expected to begin this year and be complete by 2014.

Print
Increase Text Size
Decrease Text Size

comments


Date: Newest first | Oldest first
A dense residential pocket does seem to be a very odd choice of location for a beefed up industrial power sub-station.

Safety should come before the costs of finding a more suitable (i.e. industrial) location. This is lazy policy making from the state government.

Posted by Tom, 23/02/2012 9:51:46 AM, on Melbourne Times Weekly
When the original low-voltage terminal station was built, the surrounding area included a quarry, a tip, and a very polluted Merri Creek. The terminal station now sits on the edge of park lands and sporting facilities surrounding the reclaimed creek, a short walk from CERES and in the middle of one of inner Melbourne's most sought-after residential areas. In prioritising SAusnet's 'bottom line' over the health, safety and environmental amenity of Victorian citizens, the Minister for Planning reveals himself as someone who 'knows the cost of everything and the value of nothing'.
Posted by Beryl Langer, 8/03/2012 7:49:08 PM, on Melbourne Times Weekly

post a comment


Screen name  *
Email address  *
Remember me?
Comment  *
 
We invite and encourage our readers to post comments. Comments are moderated and will appear as soon as our editor has approved them. When posting comments you agree to be bound by our Terms and Conditions.

Most popular articles


Melbourne Times Weekly


Melbourne Times Weekly







Weather brought to you by:

Weatherzone

Classifieds

Front Page

Current Issue
Privacy Policy | Conditions of Use | Advertising Terms | Copyright © 2012. Fairfax Media.
 SEND...
 SAVE...
 SHARE...